By John W. Lillpop
Editor:
By all accounts, Arizona rancher Robert Krentz was a decent man who had the misfortune of being in the wrong place at the wrong time when he was murdered in cold blood.
The wrong place was his private property. Wrong, because Krentz, presumably an American citizen, was shot and killed by an illegal alien (allegedly) from Mexico. The wrong time was late Saturday night.
According to authorities, the motive for this cold-blooded slaughter may have something to do with the fact that the victim's brother, Phil Krentz, reported drug smuggling activity on the ranch to the Border Patrol.
That sound reasonable, right? Any gringo with the audacity to report a drug smuggling operation on his property to Border Patrol deserves to bleed to death. What could be fairer, more humane?
This ugly reminder of the traiterous neglect of American citizens by pro-illegal alien lunatics in the Obama administration was reported throughout the media recently including the following statement from U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Ariz., whose Congressional district covers the area:
"The cold-blooded killing of an Arizona rancher is a sad and sobering reminder of the threats to public safety that exist in our border communities," Giffords said. "It has not yet been determined who committed this atrocity or why, but I know that federal and local authorities are mobilizing every possible resource to locate and apprehend the assailant."
“Giffords said if Krentz's killing is connected to drug cartels or smugglers, the federal government must respond appropriately.”
And just what the hell was/is the “federal government” doing in response to this invasion of America, Rep. Giffords?
For his part, President Barack Obama was engaged in the unilateral disarming of America.
When not involved in that despicble surrender to the forces of evil, our Marxist president was prodding Democrats in Congress to grant amnesty to the 20 million or so illegal aliens already here.
This makes perfect sense in the convuluted mindset of liberals who regard illegal aliens as “ripe” for picking and adding to the rolls of the Democrat party, which can no longer count on American patriots to vote for Marxist whackos.
What about the insufferable nanny fascist who goes by the name of Janet Napolitano and the absurdly inappropriate title of Secretary of Homeland Security?
No one seems to know for sure, but it seems a good bet that Nanny Janet was too busy welcoming “Newly Arrived Fugitives” to the land of free Tacos and Tequila to concern herself with a gringo rancher who was probably a racist Tea-party Republican who got what he richly deserved!
How much more of this idiocy will the American people tolerate before the streets of Chicago, Los Angeles. New York, Atlanta, and Washington, D.C. are flooded with millions of citizens demanding that the rule of law be enforced and that American sovereeignty be defended by sending U.S. troops to the U.S.-Mexico border and that illegal aliens be rounded up and kicked back across the border?
When, Pilgrims?
Wednesday, April 7, 2010
Tuesday, April 6, 2010
Obama’s Dangerous Naïveté Concerning Self-Defense
By John W. Lillpop
During the 2008 presidential campaign, Barack Obama made it perfectly clear that the use of disproportionate force was sometimes necessary to defend one’s self.
Of course, he was referring to Republicans challenging his presidential aspirations and other delusions of grandeur.
As reported in the June 18, 2008 Wall Street Journal, in part (1):
“Mobster wisdom tells us never to bring a knife to a gun fight. But what does political wisdom say about bringing a gun to a knife fight?
“That’s exactly what Barack Obama said he would do to counter Republican attacks “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun,” Obama said at a Philadelphia fundraiser Friday night.”
Hmmmmmm. Wonder why Obama did not say the following during the 2008 campaign: We will never bring guns to the fight, regardless of how violent Republicans become?
That would have been consistent with his wuss talk about taking the nuclear option off the table in order to defend America.
As reported, in part, at the New York Times (2):
“WASHINGTON — President Obama said Monday that he was revamping American nuclear strategy to substantially narrow the conditions under which the United States would use nuclear weapons.
“Discussing his approach to nuclear security the day before formally releasing his new strategy, Mr. Obama described his policy as part of a broader effort to edge the world toward making nuclear weapons obsolete, and to create incentives for countries to give up any nuclear ambitions. To set an example, the new strategy renounces the development of any new nuclear weapons, overruling the initial position of his own defense secretary.
“Mr. Obama’s strategy is a sharp shift from those of his predecessors and seeks to revamp the nation’s nuclear posture for a new age in which rogue states and terrorist organizations are greater threats than traditional powers like Russia and China.”
To moon bats on the left, Obama’s conflicting arguments make perfect sense: After all, fighting patriotic Republicans is far more vital than defending America against foreign evil-doers.
Once again, Barack Obama proves conclusively that, regardless of where he was born, he is not an American!
1 http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/06/14/obama-if-they-bring-a-knife-to-the-fight-we-bring-a-gun/
2 http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/06/world/06arms.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)